|
1. A consumer maximizes his utlity given his budget constraint
-
Budget constraint
- shows how much a consumer can purchase from two goods given his income and product prices
- A consumer's purchases does not affect the market price
- Many consumers in the market
- Pure competition on demand side of market
- Example - The easy way
- A person's income is $1,000
- Price of pizza is $10
- Price of soda is $1
- Math:
- If a consumer spent all his money on pizza, then he can buy 100 pizzas
- If a consumer spent all his money on sodas, then he can buy 1,000 sodas
- Budget constraint is shown below
2. A person has a set of prefereneces for pizza and sodas
-
Indifference curves
- shows how much utility a consumer gets from consuming two goods
- The graph has three sets of preferences
- Each indifference curve is a level of utility, and shows how much sodas and pizza yield that level of utilty
- The further right this consumer goes, then the more utlity that person has from pizza and sodas
- IC 3 gives higher utility than IC 2, and IC 2 gives higher utility than IC 1
- How do we know preferences have this shape
- Based on Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility
-
Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS)
- the consumer is willing to give up some pizza to get more soda
- Slope of the tangent line where it touches the indifference give in one spot
- MRS 1 - drawing a triangle to indicate the slope of the line
- Person has lots of pizza but little soda
- Notice the height of the triangle is greater than the width
- Person is willing to give up alot of pizza to get a little more soda
- MRS 2 - At this point, person has lots of soda but little pizza
- The triangle has a small height but a large amount of soda
- For this person to give up a little pizza, you have to get him a lot more sodas (he already has plenty).
- A consumer's budget line restricts how much goods a consumer can consume
- Looking at the graph below, the consumer wants to maximize utility
- Assume his income is $1,000 and prices for both pizza and soda is $1
- The highest indifference curve he can attain is IC 2
- At that point, he consumes 50 pizzas and 400 sodas
3. Derive a
Marshallian Demand
- Assume the price of soda increases from $1 to $2, then budget line shifts inward for sodas
- Consumer will try to obtain highest indifference curve, which is IC 1
- Consumer's utility is lower, but the price of soda increased, thus he consumes less
- We can graph the demand for sodas
- When price of soda is $1, he consumes 400 sodas
- When price of soda is $2, he consumes 100 sodas
- His demand function for soda is shown below
4. A consumer maximizes his utility given a budget contrraint
In mathematical terms, it is written as
The solution to the problem is:
- MU is marginal utility and P is price.
- When you divide by price, you are expressing numbers as "per $1."
- We are removing price differences among all products, so marginal utility can be compared.
| Product |
Product expressed as "per $1" |
2 liter (67.6 oz) Coca-cola - $1.09 1 can (12 oz) of Coca-cola - $0.50 |
62 ounces per $1 24 ounces per $1 |
If the following condition exists,
If the consumer had one more dollar, then he would buy pizza, causing the marginal utility for pizza to decrease.
|
|
1.
Hicksian Demand function
- Also called a c compensated demand function
- Utility is held constant
- Removing the income effect
- Two demand curves
- Hicksian demand curve 1
- Compensating Variation (CV) - old utility and new prices
- Using same example as Marshallian demand curve
- Assume the price of soda increases from $1 to $2, then budget line shifts inward for sodas
- Income effect - the price of soda is higher, so the consumer's real income fell
- Give the consumer more money so he ends up on the original indifference curve
- Hicksian demand only contains the substitution effect
- The income effect was removed
- The consumer ends up on the original utility function
- We can graph the demand for sodas
- When price of soda is $1, he consumes 400 sodas
- When price of soda is $2, he consumes 350 sodas
- Consumer is compensated loss of real income
- Marshallian demand was 100 sodas
- Both the Marshalliam and Hicksian demand functions for soda are shown below
- Hicksian demand functions are steeper (for normal goods)
- Removed the income effect
- Hicksian Demand Curve 2
- Equilivalent Variation - new utility and old prices
- Using same example
- Keep consumer on the new, but lower utilty function
- If there was no price increase, how much income would the consumer pay to keep the original prices
- At new utilty, the price is $1 and the consumer buys 350 sodas
- We would have to select another price and do the same to get a second point
- Equivalent Variation, just shift the Hicksian CV to the left
- All three demand functions are shown
|
|
1.
Marshallian Consumer Surplus
- the area below the demand curve but above the actual price paid.
- Measure of social welfare
- An aggregate benefit to all consumers in the market
- Includes the income effect from a price change
- Consumers' surplus is approximate
- The smaller the income effect, the better the approximation
- The market price of coffee is $1.50 and consumers buy 15 (million) pounds of coffee.
- I place a $2.50 value on this soda, but bought it for $1.50
- I received a benefit of $1.00
- If the market price of the soda decreases to $0.50, consumers' surplus increases!
| Demand for Coffee |
Demand for Coffee |
| Price |
Price |
|
|
| Quantity (in thousands) |
Quantity (in thousands) |
2.
Producer Surplus
- the area above the supply curve but below the actual sales price.
- Measure of social welfare
- An aggregate benefit to all producers in the market
- Producers' surplus is total fixed costs + profits
| Supply of Coffee |
| Price |
|
| Quantity (in thousands) |
3.
Social Welfare
is the sum of consumer plus producers' surpluses
| Supply of Coffee |
| Price |
|
| Quantity (in thousands) |
4. Hicksian Welfare Measures
-
Compensating Variation
(old utility, new prices)
- Price Decrease
- The income that could be taken away from the consumer to make them as happy as before
- Price Increase
- The income that would be given to make the consumer as happy as before the change
-
Equivalent Variation
(new utility, old prices)
- Price Decrease
- The income that would have to be given to consumer to keep it at the higher price
- Price Increase
- The income that the consumer would pay to keep it at the lower price
-
Contingent Evaluation
- measure a consumer's preference via survey
- Usually used in environmental evaluations
- Example - government plans to expand an airpot at a tourist destination and increases taxes on airline tickets to pay for it.
- Compensating Variation - how much should the government give the tourists to compensate for the higher price
- Equivalent Variation - how much would the tourists pay to keep the original airline prices
- Has problems - consumers are answering hypothetical questions and consumers may be generous in their answers
- Answers would be different if consumer had to reach into his/her pocket.
|
|
1.
Giffen Good
- as market price increases, then quantity demanded increases.
- Demand function has a positive slope and elasticity
- Sir Robert Giffen
- Inflicts the poor
- The staple good must constitute a large portion of the poor's budget
- The staple has few substitutes
- As tthe price for a cheap staple increases, the poor cannot afford the better quality food, and buy more of the cheap staple
- The income effect overwhelms the substitution effect
- A price increases causes a decline in real income
- Thus, Giffen good has to be inferior
- Examples - staples for the poor
| Potatoes Market |
| Price |
|
| Quantity |
2.
Veblen Good
- another positively sloped demand function
- Thorstein Veblen
- Why?
- Snob Effect - price becomes a measure of quality
- Bandwagon Effect - preferences for a Veblen good increase, as more consumers buy it
- Buying the good confers a status symbol
- Example
- Expensive wines
- Luxury cars
- Designer handbags
- Exotic expensive vacations
|